M/S KARSHIVNIK INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD vs M/S GOLF INTERNATIONAL

Judgment text excerpt

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 + CM(M) 1908/2025, CM APPL. 61331/2025 & 61332/2025 M/S KARSHIVNIK INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ankita and Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocates versus M/S GOLF INTERNATIONAL .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 09.09.2025 of the learned commercial court, whereby application of petitioner under Order VII Rule 14 CPC for permission to place on record additional document, which is the ledger account of the respondent/defendant maintained by the petitioner/ plaintiff was dismissed, taking a view that it is at the stage of final arguments that now petitioner/plaintiff wants to fill in lacunae. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff, I do not find this case fit to even issue notice. 3. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner/plaintiff that it is only on account of inadvertence that the said ledger account could not be filed at the CM(M) 1908/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af39 62c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b4 0f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2025.09.25 17:35:03 -07'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:25.09.2025 17:36:23 appropriate stage and plaintiff would suffer prejudice if the same is not taken on record. No other argument has been advanced. 4. It appears from record that the respondent/defendant strongly opposed the application under Order VII Rule 14 CPC before the trial court, especially