Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-17

LATE SH PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MS JAIN ENTERPRISES THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ORS & ORS. vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-14/2023 2025:DHC:8212-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
LATE SH PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MS JAIN ENTERPRISES THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ORS & ORS.
Respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 02.09.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 17.09 .2025 + FAO (COMM) 14/2023 LATE SH PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MS JAIN ENTERPRISES THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ORS & ORS. ....Appellants Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Mr. Kartikay Puneesh, Mr. Adhishwar Suri, Mr. Dushyant Kishan Kaul, Ms. Rupam Jha, Ms. Ibansara and Ms. Medhavi Bhatia, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath (Standing Counsel), Mr. Bhavishya Makhija and Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGEMENT HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. 1. The present Appeal, under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, has been filed to assail the Judgement 1 A&C Act 2. The Arbitral Award dated 30.03.2012 4, passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator, was challenged by the Appellants by filing a petition under Section 34 of the A&C Act. However, the learned Commercial Court, vide the Impugned Judgment, dismissed the said petition and upheld the Arbitral Award. 3. The dispute arises out of a contract betwee