LAKSHYA SHARMA vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13916/2025, CM APPL. 56974/2025 & CM APPL. 56975/2025 LAKSHYA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Mr. Rishabh Mishra, Mr. Ankur Gupta, Ms. KM Madhu, Ms. Manishita Bhattacharjee, Mr. Mridul Dhingra and Ms. Sapna Rai, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhartha Shankar Ray, Central Govt. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 10.09.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The petitioner challenges his transfer to Kolkata on the ground that his wife is suffering from brain tumour. 2. The representation filed by the petitioner on 3 September 2025 is still pending decision. 3. In the circumstances, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to treat the present writ petition as a representation and take a decision thereon within a period of four Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 13916/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 1 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:10.09.2025 15:18:26 weeks from today. 4. The decision as and when taken would be communicated forthwith to the petitioner. In order to enable the petitioner to avail legal remedies in case the decision is adverse to the petitioner, the operation of the decision, if adverse, shall remain stayed for a period of one week from the date it is taken. 5. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 6. Dasti under signature of the Court Master. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J. SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 dsn Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 13916/2025 Digitally Signed By:AJIT Page 2 of 2 KUMAR Signing Date:10.09.2025 15:18:26