Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-19

KISHAN LAL vs THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-5752/2025 2025:DHC:8388
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KISHAN LAL
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 19th September, 2025 + W.P.(C) 5752/2025 & CM APPL. 26277/2025 KISHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Afroz Ahmed, Advocate M: 9899972202 versus THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Sishodia and Ms. Hina Rajput, Advocates for R-4 along with respondent no. 4 in person Mob: 9810019309 Email: [email protected] Ms. Shilpa Dewan Addl. SC for MCD Mob: 9971192772 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL): 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions for taking action against the illegal and unauthorized construction raised by respondent nos. 3 and 4 in property bearing no. 8731/14-B, Municipal Ward No. 83, Shidipura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 submits that the property of the petitioner is approximately 200-300 meters away from the property of the respondent no. 4. 3. Thus, he submits that the petitioner is not the owner of any property immediate to the property, which is subject matter of the present writ Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA W.P.(C) 5752/2025 Page 1 of 10 Signing Date:21.09.2025 14:30:45 petition, and that the present writ petition would not be maintainable on that account. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 4 also draws the attention of this Court to the table showing the complaints which have been filed by the petitioner, which is reproduced as under: 5. By referring to the aforesaid table, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 submits that the petitioner is in the habit of filing various complaints with respect to various properties, despite the fact that the petitioner is not the immediate neig

KISHAN LAL vs THE COMMISSIONER MCD & ORS. · Niyam