JAIN SHIKANJI PRIVATE LIMITED vs SATISH KUMAR JAIN

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17.09.2025 + FAO (COMM) 130/2023 & CM APPL. 32196/2023 JAIN SHIKANJI PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr.Vipin Rana, Mr.K. S. Verma, Ms.Ritu, Mr.Vinay Panwar, Mr.B. L. Gupta and Mr.Vishu Gupta, Advs. versus SATISH KUMAR JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr.Gaurav Barathi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the Order dated 03.06.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court-01) East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the, „Trial Court‟) in CS (COMM) No. 171/2021, titled Satish Kumar Jain v. Jain Shikanji Pvt. Ltd., on an application filed by the respondent under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (in short, „CPC‟) and finding the appellant guilty of wilful disobedience of the Order of ad-interim injunction dated 05.11.2022, and visiting one of the Directors of the appellant namely, Mr. Anubhav Jain to civil imprisonment for a period of eight weeks. He was directed to surrender before the Court Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed FAO (COMM) 130/2023 Page 1 of 7 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:17.09.2025 20:38:50 within 15 days of passing of the said Order. 2. When the appeal came to be listed before this Court, by the Order dated 12.06.2023, this Court stayed only the direction of the learned Trial Court with respect to surrender of Mr. Anubhav Jain. The other directions of the learned Trial Court were, therefore, to continue to operate. 3. The above order had been passed by this Court in view of the affidavit filed by Mr. Anubhav Jain in Court, the operative part of which was re-produced by this Court in its Order dated