HOSHIYAR SINGH & ORS. vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 19.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 893/2025 HOSHIYAR SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Jwala, Advocate. Petitioner No. 1 in person. Petitioner No. 2 through VC. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. … Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Hoshiyaar Singh, SI Narender Arya, SI Sumit, PS-Budh Vihar. Ms. Nauda Nandini, Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Advocates. Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 68/2019, dated 07.03.2019, registered at P.S Budh Vihar, District Rohini, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. CRL.M.C. 893/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:20.09.2025 12:32:42 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 25.07.2015 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies. No child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner’s son and Respondent No. 2 were living separately. 3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners. 4. During the pendancy of the proceedings, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, North/West, Rohini, New Delhi and the terms of the compromise were reduced into wri