HIMANSHU JAIN & ORS. vs THE STATE GNCTD & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 12.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 6483/2025, CRL.M.A. 27343-44/2025 HIMANSHU JAIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, Adv. Petitioners no.1, 3 and 5 in person. Petitioner nos. 2 and 4 through vc versus THE STATE GNCTD & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP with W/SI Bimla, and SI Lal Chand, P.S.S.B.Dairy Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Ankit Sisodia, Mr. Sarthak Gupta, Ms. Atti Tyagi, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 253/2022, dated 06.04.2022, registered at P.S Shahbad Dairy, Delhi under Sections CRL.M.C. 6483/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:12.09.2025 17:22:41 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 08.12.2019 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. One child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since 20.09.2021. 3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 498A/406/34IPC against the petitioners. 4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into w