G4S LIMITED AND ANOTHER vs 4GROUP SAFEGUARD AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on: 26.09.2025 + CS(COMM) 276/2024 G4S LIMITED AND ANOTHER .....Plaintiffs Versus 4GROUP SAFEGUARD AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS .....Defendants Advocates who appeared in these cases For the Plaintiffs : Mr. Essenese Obhan and Ms. Yogita Rathore, Advocates. For the Defendants : Mr. Saral Sharma and Ms. Ekta, Advocates for D1, 3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA JUDGMENT TEJAS KARIA, J I.A. 7433/2024 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1. The present Application has been filed by the Plaintiffs under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeking an interim injunction restraining the Defendants from using the Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 276/2024 Page 1 of 15 Signed By:NEELAM SHARMA Signing Date:26.09.2025 16:57:35 Marks ‘4GS’, ‘ ’ and ‘ ’ (“Impugned Marks”) or any other Marks which are identical or deceptively similar to the registered Marks of the Plaintiffs ‘G4S’, ‘ ’ and ‘ ’ (“Plaintiffs’ Marks”) either as a Trade Mark or part of a Trade Mark, Trade Name or part of a Trade Name, Corporate Name, Electronic Mail, Domain Name or part of a Domain Name, or in any manner, which would amount to infringement or passing off of the Plaintiffs’ Marks. 2. Vide Order dated 03.04.2025, an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted against the Defendants restraining them from using the Mark ‘ ’ and ‘4gs part’ of the Domain Name, ‘www.4gs.co.in’. (“Impugned Domain Name”), however, the use of the Mark ‘ ’ was not restrained and the question of the deceptive similarity of the Mark ‘ ’ was left open. Signature Not Verified CS(COMM) 276/2024 Page 2 of 15 Signed By:NEELAM SHARMA Signing Date:26.09.2025 16:57:35 SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS: 3. The learned Counsel for