Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-18

DR MAHESH Y REDDY vs KEVIN MARCUS WILLIAM GOVINDER SINGH OLAUSSON

Citation / case number
ARB.P.-150/2025 2025:DHC:8758
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DR MAHESH Y REDDY
Respondent
KEVIN MARCUS WILLIAM GOVINDER SINGH OLAUSSON
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 18.09.2025 IN THE MATTERS OF: ARB.P. 150/2025 DR MAHESH Y REDDY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Adv. versus KEVIN MARCUS WILLIAM GOVINDER SINGH OLAUSSON .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tamradhwaj Sharma, Adv. O-2 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 57/2025 & I.A 4380/2025 DR MAHESH Y REDDY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritesh Khatri, Adv. versus KEVIN MARCUS WILLIAM GOVINDER SINGH OLAUSSON .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tamradhwaj Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration 2. Mr. Ritesh Khatri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that in view of two agreements dated 01.09.2016 and 29.03.2022, there exists a valid arbitration clause and if any dispute arises between the parties, the same is amenable to be adjudicated by the Arbitrator. 3. According to him, under the agreement, certain services were to be discharged/ rendered by the petitioner to the respondent as a consultant. He, therefore, contends that in lieu of the services having been rendered to the respondent