DEEPAK YADAV vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 15.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 6550/2025 & CRL.M.A. 27606/2025 EXEMPTION FROM FILING TYPED COPIES ETC. DEEPAK YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kr. Khatri, Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP with ASI Inder Singh, PS Farsh Bazar. Mr. Kapil Goyal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 517/2023, dated 09.11.2023, registered at P.S Farsh Bazar, District Shahdara, Delhi under Sections 323/506/451/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per allegations made in the FIR, respondent no. 2 and his staff were threatened and abused in their shop by petitioner and other accused on account of demand of money. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 323/506/451/34 IPC against the petitioners. CRL.M.C. 6550/2025 Page 1 of 3 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:16.09.2025 11:10:13 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed their terms of settlement in writing in a Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement dated 12.08.2025. Copy of the Memorandum of Understanding/Settlement dated 12.08.2025 has been annexed as Annexure P-3. 4. Petitioner is physically present before the Court while Respondent no. 2 has entered his appearance through VC. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer ASI Inder Singh, from PS Farsh Bazar. 5. Respondent no