Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-23

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 20711 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 20711 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 20711 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20711 of 2025 Anoop @ Anoop Kumar Patel .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Pranvesh Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pranvesh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is assailing the legality and validity of the FIR dated 15.8.2025 lodged in Case Crime No.252 of 2025 under Sections- 108,351(2).351(3) B.N.S., Police Station- Premnagar, District- Jhansi. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no offence against the petitioner is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of causing harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. At this stage, the argument raised by learned counsel for the petitioner involve factual disputes and appraisal of

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 20711 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam