Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-01

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 17429 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 17429 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 17429 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17429 of 2025 Dharmendra Urf Mula And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashank Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State-respondents. 2. Although, the prayer made in this writ petition is to quash the First Information Report dated 9.07.2025 giving rise to Case Crime No.209 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 224, 121(1), 132, 329(3), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station - Arniya, District - Bulandshahr. 3. We have perused the the First Information Report, which prima facie discloses commissioning of cognizable offence and, therefore, the prayer made to quash F.I.R. otherwise cannot be entertained in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani, (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others, (2021) SCC Online SC 315. 4. We are

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 17429 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam