Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-12

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20180 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20180 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20180 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20180 of 2025 Divik .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saroj Kumar Dubey, Vikas Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Singh Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the first informant has filed counter affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant does not wish to file rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the first informant, Sri Yagyavalk Pandey, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 4. This bail application under Section 483 BNS has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Divik, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 299 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80 (2), 103 (1), 238, 62 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Mansoorpur, District Muzaffarnagar. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this case crime number and is languishing in jail s

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 20180 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam