Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-01

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 142 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 142 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 142 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 142 of 2025 Priyanka Yadav .....Applicant(s) Versus Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Natural Gas And Petroleum Deptt. New Delhi And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Srawan Kumar Pandey, Madan Gopal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. (C.M. Application No.1 of 2025) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the review application. 2. Heard. 3. We have gone through the affidavit in support of the application seeking condonation of delay in filing this review application. Cause shown is sufficient. Accordingly, the application is allowed and delay is condoned. (Order on memo of review application) 4. Heard. 5. Even if the affidavit was of a date subsequent to the application filed on 25.09.2023, it would not make much of a difference to the order which we CMRAD No. 142 of 2025 2 had passed. Apparently, no error has been pointed out which could persuade us to review our order dated 28.03.2025. 6. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. (Manjive S

CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. 142 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam