BADAL @ BADAL RAJPUT AND ORS vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 5075/2025 BADAL @ BADAL RAJPUT AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Kanchan and Ms. Minakshi Kumari, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State. Respondent No.2 with IO/SI Krishan Kumar. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 592/2023 of PS Mundka for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Respondent no.2 identified by IO/SI Krishan Kumar is present in court. Detailed statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. State has no serious objection to this petition. CRL.M.C.5075/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569a f3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, KATHPALIA st=Delhi, Signature Not Verified serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996 b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.02 17:09:08 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:02.09.2025 18:32:03 3. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi and it is stated by them that they have resolved all matrimonial disputes amicably. Respondent no.2 specifically submitted that she has received the full and final settlement amount in lieu of her stridhan and alimony. Marriage between the parties already stands dissolved by decree of divorce and no child was born out of the wedlock. Respondent no.2 also states she does not wish to pursue prosecution of the petitioners. 4. Hav