ANJU RANI vs THE STATE ( NCT GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 27th August, 2025 Pronounced on: 23rd September, 2025 + CRL. M.C. 4503/2018 Smt. A .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Kaushal and Mr. Aaryan Sharma, Advocates. versus 1. The State (NCT Govt. of Delhi) 2. Mr. Rajan Khurana S/o Late Sh. Harbans Lal Khurana R/o D-15, Harbhajan Enclave Pusa Campus, New Delhi -110012 .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JUDGMENT 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Smt. A, seeks to assail the Order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Ld. ASJ, New Delhi whereby the Order dated 03.09.2011 of the Ld. MM discharging the Respondent No.2 in FIR No. 99/2008 under Sections 506/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA Crl. M.C. 4503/2018 Page 1 of 13 Signing Date:23.09.2025 19:00:14 “IPC”), P.S. Inderpuri, was upheld. 2. Briefly stated, the case of the Petitioner/Complainant is that the accused was terminated from service due to his bad habits. On 22.06.2008, she along with her sister at around 9:00 PM., was walking in the park, when the accused, Rajan Khurana along with his wife Sanjeevan Prakash, came and started abusing and using unparliamentary language, against them. It is alleged that the accused in a loud tone, claimed that he was a “gunda” having links with gunda elements and threatened to kill her and her husband. The Petitioner and her family members have been living under constant threat and fear from the Accused/Respondent No.2. 3. Petitioner lodged a Complaint against Respondent No.2 at P.S. Inderpuri, but no ac