AMIT SETHI vs SH LALIT SETHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV + CS(OS) 936/2024 and I.A. 46333/2024 Between: - AMIT SETHI S/O SH. LALIT SETHI R/O C-76, AB, KALKAJI, NEW DELHI-110019 .... PLAINTIFF (Through: Ms. Rekha Saroha, Mr. Mohit Saroha, Advocates.) AND 1. SH. LALIT SETHI S/O LATE RAM LAL SETHI 2. SH. SAMEER SETHI S/O SH. LALIT SETHI 3. SMT. SANTOSH SETHI W/O LATE KULBHUSHAN SETHI 4. SH. SUMIT SETHI S/O LATE KULBHUSHAN SETHI ALL RESIDENTS OF:- C-76, AB, KALKAJI, NEW DELHI-110019 ....DEFENDANTS (Through: Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, Mr.Harshit and Mr.Sagar Agarwal, Advocates for D-1 & D2., Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate for D-3 and 4) Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:17.09.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 11:58:38 1 KUMAR KAURAV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % Reserved on: 28.08.2025 Pronounced on: 15.09.2025 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT I.A. 2205/2025 (under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC) The instant application is filed by defendants nos.1 and 2 for rejection of the present suit under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as „CPC‟) for being devoid of any cause of action and for failure to disclose the necessary facts. Factual Matrix 2. The present suit is one for partition, wherein the plaintiff seeks a declaration that he is the absolute owner of his 1/5th share in property bearing No. C-76, AB, Kalkaji, New Delhi, measuring 200 sq. yds. (hereinafter referred to as the “suit property”), along with other consequential reliefs. 3. A pedigree chart describing the relation of the parties in the instant lis is given as under: - Ram Lal Se