AMIT RAJAK vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 16.09.2025 + CRL.REV.P. 155/2024 & CRL.M.A. 3315/2024 AMIT RAJAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. S. Rawat, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajkumar, APP for the State. CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of this revision petition, the petitioner assails order dated 06.11.2023 [hereafter „impugned order‟], passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-06/Children‟s Court, East District, Karkardooma Court, Delhi [hereafter „Children’s Court‟], in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 181/2021, registered at Police Station Mayur Vihar, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter „IPC‟] and Section 6 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [hereafter „POCSO Act‟]. 2. Vide the impugned order, the order dated 12.04.2022, passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, JJB-IV, East District, Vishwas Nagar, Delhi [hereafter „Magistrate‟] had been upheld. CRL.REV.P. 155/2024 Page 1 of 19 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:16.09.2025 19:37:44 3. The FIR in this case was registered on the complaint of „S‟ i.e. mother of the victim, who alleged that her minor daughter „K‟, aged about six years, used to take tuition from the accused Amit (CCL) for the last three months. It was alleged that on 06.04.2021, her daughter had informed her that during tuition classes, the accused used to kiss her on her vagina after removing her undergarments. It was further alleged that CCL used to put his private part in the mouth of the victim. As alleged, when the victim would object or cry, the accused would beat he