AJIT KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 10.09.2025 + W.P.(C) 13879/2025 AJIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Ajit Kumar Pathak, SPC, Mr.Ankur, GP and Ms.Akriti Pathak, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPLs. 56863-64/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 13879/2025 & CM APPL. 56862/2025 2. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 18.08.2025 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in M.A. No. 3079/2025 in O.A. No.2340/2025, titled Ajit Kumar v. Union of India, whereby the learned Tribunal disposed of the O.A. as having been rendered infructuous, while granting liberty to the petitioner herein to raise all grounds taken by him in the said O.A. against his transfer in the subsequently filed O.A. No.2940/2025. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 13879/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:12.09.2025 16:46:27 3. A few facts relevant to the present petition are that the petitioner was posted at Tirunelveli on 29.12.2023. He was sought to be transferred to HSU, Bengaluru on 09.06.2025, against which the petitioner filed a representation and thereafter instituted O.A. No.2340/2025 before the learned Tribunal. 4. In the said O.A., the learned Tribunal, vide Order dated 20.06.2025, while granting interim protection to the petitioner against his transfer, directed the respondent to dispose of his representation. 5. The respondent rejected the representation of the petitioner vide Order dated 03.07.2025, against which the petitioner filed O.A. No.2610/2025. N