AJAY & ORS. vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~72 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 6188/2025 & CRL.M.A. 26222/2025 AJAY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S. N. Quresh and Mr. Harish Kumar Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Dharam Singh, PS Maidan Garhi. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 278/2023 of PS Maidan Garhi for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Respondent no.2 present with her counsel and identified by IO/SI Dharam Singh accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection to this petition. CRL.M.C.6188/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af39 62c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40 f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.02 17:18:01 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:02.09.2025 18:32:03 3. I have spoken with the parties in Hindi and it is submitted by them that they have resolved all matrimonial disputes amicably. It is stated by them that now all of them are living together as a happy family. Respondent no.2 specifically submits that now she has no grievance against any of the petitioners as they are treating her well. Respondent no.2 submits that she is not interested to pursue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spoken wit