Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-01

AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-2143/2025 2025:DHC:7583
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR
Respondent
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.09.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2143/2025 & CRL.M.A.26041/2025 AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Girijesh Pandey and Mr. Vatsalya, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Amit Kumar, PS Crime Branch. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 215/2021 of PS Crime Branch for offence under Section 419/420 IPC. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant as well as learned APP assisted by IO/SI Amit Kumar. 2. Broadly speaking, prosecution case is as follows. In the month of June 2020, Mr. Amit Talwar, a family friend of the complainant de facto introduced him with the present accused/applicant at Jalandhar Gymkhana Club. The present accused/applicant represented himself as Ajay Shah, nephew of the Union Home Minister and assured to get the complainant de facto a tender worth Rs.90 crores from Government of India with respect to BAIL APPLN. 2143/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cac ca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c48796 5ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.01 17:41:52 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:01.09.2025 17:54:10 supply of leather for renovation of President’s Estate. After sometime, one Ramesh Kumar (co-accused) representing himself as the inspecting officer from the Union Government visited the complainant de facto and inspected his factory. The complainant de

AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. · Niyam