Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-25

ABID KHAN vs NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-12858/2025 2025:DHC:8768
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ABID KHAN
Respondent
NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 25.09.2025 W.P.(C) 12858/2025 ABID KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sumitra Choudhary, Mr. Raghav Raman, Ms. Nitya Sharma and Ms. Jasmine Sheikh, Advs. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC for R-1/NTA with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Tarandeep Singh, Ms. Vilakshana Dayma and Ms. Mukta Singh, Advs. Mr. Raj Kumar, CGSC for R-2/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed seeking following relief: “(a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No. 1 to recalculate the Petitioner’s OMR evaluation for question No. 137 to 141 and awarding marks for the five uncounted but correctly marked responses and thereafter revise the result and rank of the Petitioner based on corrected marks consequently considering the Petitioner for 2. The grievance ventilated by the petitioner in the present petition is that the petitioner took NEET (UG) 2025 exam and secured 92.5368 percentile. It is stated that when the scanned images of OMR sheet and recorded responses for NEET (U

ABID KHAN vs NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS. · Niyam