ZIYAUDDIN vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 30th October, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2043/2025 ZIYAUDDIN S/o Nazimuddin .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Jha, Mr. Nitin Bansal and Ms. Mahima Chaudhary, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Dilsukh, PS KNK Marg, Rohini. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Second Application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.PC’)/Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘B.N.S.S.) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Ziyauddin, for grant of Anticipatory Bail in FIR No. 253/2024 dated 19.07.2024 under Section 380/420/448/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) registered at Police Station K.N. Katju Marg. 2. It is submitted that the two Anticipatory Bail Applications filed by the Applicant, were dismissed by the learned Sessions Court on 10.09.2024 and 13.02.2025 respectively. He had filed Bail Application No. 930/2025 for grant of Anticipatory Bail before this Court, which was withdrawn by him on 09.04.2025. Thereafter, Third Anticipatory Bail Application filed before Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 2043/2025 Page 1 of 6 Digitally Signed By:ANIL KUMAR BHATT Signing Date:31.10.2025 16:25:45 the Court of Sessions, was dismissed on 29.04.2025. The Bail is sought on the ground that he was not named in the FIR by the Complainant. The Police Officials started visiting his house at odd hours, with an intent to falsely implicate him in this Case. There is in fact a dispute over property between Smt. Parkash Devi Gulati and Smt. Poonam and Ors., in respect of which, one Civ