Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-15

WRIT - C No. 9600 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 9600 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 9600 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9600 of 2025 M/S Baba Brick Field, Lucknow Thru Proprietor Baldeo Kumar Khatwani .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Environment Forests And Climate Change Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanesh Kumar Singh, Gaurav Singh, Sachin Kumar, Shailesh Sachan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashok Kumar Verma Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for L.D.A. and Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Considering the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to rejection of application for grant of consent to operate under relevant provisions of the statutes referred in the order dated 30.09.2024, the requisite documents and formalities have been completed and as Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the respondents says that the Board will consider the application of the petitioner accordingly taking into consideration the subsequent formalities completed by the petitioner and a fresh decision would be taken, we dispose

WRIT - C No. 9600 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam