Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-31

WRIT - C No. 8878 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 8878 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 8878 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8878 of 2025 Nuetech System Control And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. List revised. None present to press the writ petition. 2. Sri Siddharth Verma holding brief of Sri Anadi Krishna Narayan, learned counsel for the respondents states that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the bank has withdrawn the recovery certificate. 3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) October 31, 2025 Pratima Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 8878 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam