WRIT - C No. 61235 of 2013 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 61235 of 2013 Arvin Malik .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru Chief Secy. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Dutt, Keshari Nath Tripathi, Malti Sharma, Pradeep Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pranjal Mehrotra, R.K. Singh Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) October 13, 2025 Pkb/ Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD KUMAR BAJPAI High Court