Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-29

WRIT - C No. 36925 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 36925 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 36925 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36925 of 2025 Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Recovery has been issued pursuant to the maintenance order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. 3. Civil writ petition filed to challenge such recovery is misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail statutory remedy in accordance with law. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) October 29, 2025 Faraz Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 36925 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam