Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-16

WRIT - C No. 36143 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 36143 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 36143 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36143 of 2025 Sayra And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Agarawal, Shyam Mani Shukla, Suresh C. Dwivedi Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred for a direction commanding the respondents not to take any coercive measures, demolition or otherwise with regard to the house and shop belonging to the petitioners. 3. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petition pending in light of the directions proposed to be passed today. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we find it appropriate that the petitioners may file a fresh representation ventilating all their grievance before the Nagar Ayukt, Nagar Nigam, Agra along with certified copy of this order within one week from today, who shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the

WRIT - C No. 36143 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam