WRIT - C No. 36142 of 2013 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36142 of 2013 Jeevan Lal Sonker .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Gaurav Singh, Kripa Shanker Singh, Purnendu Kumar Singh, Saroj Kumar Yadav Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter is listed under the heading “Oldest Pending Cases in this High Court for Priority Hearing.” The case was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been filed. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) October