WRIT - C No. 35858 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35858 of 2025 Mustakeem .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Rajesh Tripathi, Ramesh Kumar Shukla Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Anand Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Smriti Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the Bank. 2. Petitioner has committed default in repayment of secured debt to the respondent-Bank. Bank has initiated proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Auction sale notice has been issued however, no auction has taken place. 3. In view of that development, primarily no interference may be offered on the merits of the dispute brought by the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not interested in raising any dispute on merits of the recovery being pressed against the petitioner. In fact, the petitioner does not propose to file or press any objection