WRIT - C No. 35452 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35452 of 2025 Majhar Ali .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Ramanuj Saini Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmendra Singh Chauhan Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioners today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the State-respondents and Sri S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Bareilly Development Authority. 3. The instant writ petition has been preferred against the impugned notice dated 30.09.2025 under section 27(1) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 passed by respondent no.2-Vice Chairman, Bareilly Development Authority, Bareilly. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-Authority has apprised to the Court the proceeding under section 27 of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. While the proceedings were pending consideration, the petitioner continued unabated constructions over