Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-07

WRIT - C No. 35003 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 35003 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 35003 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35003 of 2025 Ram Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar, R.B.Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Harsh Vardhan Gupta Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri R.B. Pal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents and Shri Vibhu Rai, learned counsel for Prayagraj Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for quashing the notice/ order dated 8.9.2025 passed by respondent no.3 under Section 27 (1) of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (in short "Act, 1973") and for a direction to respondents not to demolish the house of the petitioner being Plot/ House No.699/16, Baghambari Gaddi, Zone 3, Prayagraj. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for Authority has raised an objection qua the maintainability of the writ petition on two fold submissions. He firstly submits that the Act, 1973 is self-contained Act, wherein full fledged mechanism is provided. Admittedly, inspite of

WRIT - C No. 35003 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam