Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-13

WRIT - C No. 34971 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 34971 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 34971 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34971 of 2025 Smt. Kelawati And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kaushalendra Nath Singh, C.S.C. Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents and Sri K.N. Singh, learned counsel for New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to give 5% additional compensation to the petitioners under the strength of the order of this Court in the case of Gajraj v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2011 (11) ADJ 1 and for a direction to respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 27.09.2023 within stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the relief prayed in the instant matter, we dispose of the instant petition with liberty to the petitioners to make fresh representation along with true attested copy

WRIT - C No. 34971 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam