Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-07

WRIT - C No. 34883 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 34883 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 34883 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34883 of 2025 Nitin Vinayak .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Bahadur Singh, Anil Kumar Pandey, Rajnish Kumar, Vijaya Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the notice of the petition on Mohd. Afzal learned counsel for RERA, during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mukul Tripathi learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mohd. Afzal learned counsel for respondent No. 2. 3. Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus upon respondent No. 3 for recovery of Rs. 73,38,147.33/- together with interest from respondent No. 4 pursuant to the order dated 01.11.2021 passed by respondent No. 2. 4. Without entering into the merits, present writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to make best efforts to ensure that necessary recovery is made strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably before 31.12.2025, if there is no legal impediment. (Indrajeet Shu

WRIT - C No. 34883 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam