WRIT - C No. 34714 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 34714 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Kumar Pandey, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyan Prakash Shrivastava, Vijay Kumar Srivastava Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. List revised. None present for the petitioner to press the writ petition. Sri Gyan Prakash Shrivastava learned counsel for the respondent bank and the learned Standing Counsel are present. 2. First, it may be noted that learned counsel for the petitioner was present in the first call. He was given time to obtain instructions - if the petitioner is willing to settle the dispute with the bank by making deposit of the entire amount being claimed, in installments. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the matter may be taken up in the revised call. However, he has absented himself in the revised call. 4. At the outset, recovery is being pursued against the petitioner under SARFAESI Act, 2002. At present the respondent bank is claiming Rs. 27,00,000/- together with interest. 5. Though, auction not