Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-09

WRIT - C No. 33976 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 33976 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 33976 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33976 of 2025 Geeta Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajai Kumar Malviya, Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ramesh Kumar Shukla Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajai Kumar Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the Bank. 2. Petitioner has committed default in repayment of secured debt to the respondent-Bank. Bank has initiated proceedings under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Auction sale notice has been issued however, no auction has taken place. 3. In view of that development, primarily no interference may be offered on the merits of the dispute brought by the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not interested in raising any dispute on merits of the recovery being pressed against the petitioner. In fact, the petitioner does not propose t

WRIT - C No. 33976 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam