Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-08

WRIT - C No. 33736 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 33736 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 33736 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33736 of 2025 Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Saxena .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udisha Tripathi, Vaibhav Tripathi, Vinod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Having heard Sri Vinod Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mukul Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, present petition is found to be misconceived inasmuch as no interference may be offered in the recovery proceedings arising under an award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. 2. Leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies in accordance with law, present writ petition is dismissed. October 8, 2025 Mohit (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

WRIT - C No. 33736 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam