Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-13

WRIT - C No. 33710 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 33710 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 33710 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33710 of 2025 Kali Charan Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nitin Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dharmendra Singh Chauhan Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Nitin Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondent and Shri Abhimanyu Singh, learned counsel for Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for quashing the impugned notice dated 12.08.2025 issued by respondent no.3 as well as the entire proceeding against the petitioner under Section 27 (1) of the U.P. Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 (in short "Act, 1973") and for a direction to respondents not to demolish the shop of the petitioner situated over Khasra No.1283, Surakh Bangar, Tehsil and District Mathura. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has vehemently contended that though in the instant matter notice had been affixed over the shop in question showing

WRIT - C No. 33710 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam