WRIT - C No. 18574 of 2013 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18574 of 2013 Smt. Sunita .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Singh, Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhay Dwivedi, Abhay Kumar Dwivedi, Ashish Kumar Srivastava, B.D. Pandey, Dhananjay Awasthi, Narendra Pratap Singh Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Sri Narendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) October 29, 2025 P