WRIT - C No. 18378 of 2019 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18378 of 2019 Ram Pratap And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Raj Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 40 AFR HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. (Per: Hon'ble Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) 1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. At the very outset, counsel for the petitioner informs that the petitioner no.1, Sri Ram Pratap has passed away during the pendency of the present writ petition and no effort whatsoever has been made by the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner no.1 to get themselves substituted as party in the present writ petitioner. Hence, the present writ petition stands abated in respect of petitioner no.1 under Chapter VIII Rule 38A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. 3. The contention of the petitioners is essentially that the petitioner no.1 was granted a mining lease over Gata No.2434 for an area of 2 Acres on 18.07.2001 for the tenure of 10 years. Similarly, the petitioner no.2 was grante