Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-10

WRIT - A No. 2021 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 2021 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 2021 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT – A No. - 2021 of 2024 Central Board of …..Petitioners(s) Trustees EPFO Versus The Central …..Respondents(s) Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench and another Counsel for Petitioners(s) : Satyajit Mukerji Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Kumar Pandey Chief Justice Court HON’BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard Shri Satyajit Mukerji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Dinesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. The respondent no. 1, being the Tribunal itself, has been arrayed in proforma capacity. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the respondent of Original Application (O.A.) No. 366 of 2017 (Smt. Renuka Sharma vs. Union of India and others) challenging the order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad (‘the Tribunal’) whereby the Tribunal has allowed the O.A., set aside the orders dated 08.11.2016 and 15.12.2016 impugned therein and issued direction to refund the amount of Rs. 1,37,282/-, which had been 2 Writ-A No. 2021 of 2024 deducted by the petitioner from the post retiral dues of the respondent, along with simple i

WRIT - A No. 2021 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam