TAC DESIGN PVT LTD vs AARTH REAL TECH VENTURES PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1749/2025 Date of Decision: 17.10.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: TAC DESIGN PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Kartik Malhotra and Mr. Karthik, Advs. versus AARTH REAL TECH VENTURES PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Swapnil Gupta and Ms. Sajal Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) I.A. 26176/2025 (filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons assigned in the application, the same stands allowed and the delay of 10 days in refiling the petition stands condoned. 2. Application stands disposed of. ARB.P. 1749/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) seeking the appointment of Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:PRIYA Signed Signing Date:29.10.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:02:43 KUMAR KAURAV an arbitrator for the adjudication of disputes arising out of agreements executed between the parties for providing comprehensive architectural, master planning, and interior design services for a hotel project. 2. The dispute has admittedly arisen, and there exists an arbitration clause 6 in the agreements which have been executed for the comprehensive Master Plan/ Architecture and interior design dated 06.02.2024 and 30.07.2024. 3. Clause 06 of the agreement is extracted as under: “06 ARBITRATION All differences and disputes arising between the parties on any matter connected with this agreement or regarding the interpretation of the contents thereof shall be referred to an arbitrator to be jointly agreed to by both Parties and resolved under the provisions of the Indian Arbitr