SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 19th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 08th October, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1915/2025 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH S/o Vishwanath Singh R/o H.No.100, Jagatpur, Dikhat Mai, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh-205367. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Samsun Nihar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through SHO P.S. Ranhola. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. First Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. read with Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner in case FIR No.0849/2024 under Section 304B/498A/34 IPC (Section 80/85/3(5) BNS) registered at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi. 2. It is submitted that the Applicant is father-in-law of deceased Sonam Kumar w/o Pankaj. It is claimed that there is no link between the death of daughter-in-law and the registration of FIR under dowry death by the Police. Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 1915/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:08.10.2025 19:25:57 3. Deceased Sonam Kumari w/o Pankaj is a case of natural death due to heart attack while she was at her parental home. The Police have mixed up the investigations after recording false statements of the parent of the deceased. 4. About six months prior to her death the deceased had accidently consumed acidic substance. Her statement was recorded at Police Station Pala, Faridabad vide DD No.20 dated 21.08.2024 wherein she that while working, she accidentally consumed some acid for which no one was responsible. The matter was closed on her statement. The deceased took the treatment of her throat which got fully cured. 5. The Applicant asserts that he had spent about Rs.