SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD vs DWD PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

Judgment text excerpt

$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 310/2022 & CM APPL. 51565/2022 SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate. versus DWD PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Karan Bajaj and Ms. Aastha Arora, Advocates. + FAO(OS) (COMM) 12/2023 & CM APPL. 2997/2023 DWD PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Karan Bajaj and Ms. Aastha Arora, Advocates. versus SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 28.10.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. These are cross appeals emanating out of order dated 22 November 2022 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in IAs 14992/2022, 7825/2022 and 9523/2022. Subsequently, the parties entered into an amicable resolution of their disputes between them and Signature Not Verified Signed By:GUNN FAO(OS) (COMM) 310/2022 & conn. Page 1 of 2 Signing Date:30.10.2025 17:50:24 moved IA 14296/2025 under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the learned Single Judge. The said application stands allowed by the learned Single Judge and the suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement between the parties. 2. Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel for Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, points out that costs of ₹10 lakhs had been imposed by the learned Single Judge on his client. He also points out that, among the terms of settlement was clause (f) which recorded the consent of the respondent-defendant to the present appeal being allowed to the extent of setting aside the cost of ₹ 10 lakhs. 3. In that view of the matter, nothing survives for adjudication in the present appeals. Both