Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-29

SUKHWINDER SINGH vs KUMAR MANAV SHARMA

Citation / case number
FAO(OS)-122/2025 2025:DHC:9417-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SUKHWINDER SINGH
Respondent
KUMAR MANAV SHARMA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 17.10.2025 Judgment pronounced on:29.10.2025 + FAO (OS) 122/2025, CM APPL.66068/2025, CM APPL. 66069/2025 SUKHWINDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Avinash Das, Adv. versus KUMAR MANAV SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kawar Udai Bhan Singh Sehrawat, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR JUDGMENT ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. 1. The Appellant [Plaintiff before the learned Single Judge] assails the correctness of order dated 08.08.2025 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned order’], whereby the learned Single Judge declined to grant interim injunction in his favour in a pending suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell, or in the alternative, recovery of Rs.2,25,00,000/-. FACTUAL MATRIX 2. In order to comprehend issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts are required to be noticed. 3. A perusal of the record reflects that the Respondent [Defendant 4. There are two Agreements to Sell, one after the other, executed between the parties, which are not disputed. The first Agreement to Sell was entered into on 10.08.2024, wherein the Respondent