STATE vs LAXMAN & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 25th September 2025 Pronounced on: 28th October 2025 + CRL.L.P. 83/2019 STATE Govt. of NCT of Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. Versus 1. LAXMAN SINGH S/o Sh. Jagdish Singh R/o8630, Roshanara Road, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. 2. DEEPAK S/o Sh. Jagdish Singh R/o 8630, Roshanara Road, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Rajpal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CRL.L.P. 83/2019 1. A Leave to Appeal Petition under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners challenging the impugned Order/Judgment dated 11.09.2018 passed by learned Special Judge (NDPS)-1, Central CRL.A.______/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:28.10.2025 17:05:49 District Tis Hazari, Delhi, thereby acquitting the Respondents for the offence punishable under Section 324/34 IPC. 2. It is submitted that the impugned judgment is based on conjectures and surmises and therefore, bad in law. The testimony of the witnesses have not been appreciated in right perspective. The learned Trial Court has failed to consider that though the injury suffered by the Complainant and his wife was Simple, the weapon used to cause the injury was a sharp object. Submissions heard. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned APP for the State, the Leave Petition is allowed and accordingly disposed of. CRL.A.______/2025 (To be numbered by the Registry) 4. An Appeal under Section 378(1) Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/State to challenge the Judgment dated 11.09.2018 passed by learned ASJ, Delhi, whereby the Respondents herein have been acquitted in case FIR No.492/2015 under Section 323/324/34 IPC r