STATE vs LAXMAN & ANR.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 25th September 2025 Pronounced on: 28th October 2025 CRL.L.P. 83/2019 STATE Govt. of NCT of Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. Versus 1. LAXMAN SINGH S/o Sh. Jagdish Singh R/o8630, Roshanara Road, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. 2. DEEPAK S/o Sh. Jagdish Singh R/o 8630, Roshanara Road, Subzi Mandi, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Rajpal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. CRL.L.P. 83/2019 1. A Leave to Appeal Petition under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners challenging the impugned Order/Judgment dated 11.09.2018 passed by learned Special Judge (NDPS)-1, Central CRL.A.______/2025 2. It is submitted that the impugned judgment is based on conjectures and surmises and therefore, bad in law. The testimony of the witnesses have not been appreciated in right perspective. The learned Trial Court has failed to consider that though the injury suffered by the Complainant and his wife was Simple, the weapon used to cause the injury was a sharp object. Submissions heard. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned APP f