Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-10-10

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 143 of 2024 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 143 of 2024 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL No. 143 of 2024 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 143 of 2024 U.P. Public Service Commission (Uppsc), Prayagraj Thru. Secy. And Another .....Appellant(s) Versus Rafe Akhlaque Ansari And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Ravi Shanker Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ram Raj, C.S.C. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Heard. 2. Shri Ram Raj, learned counsel who appears for the respondent no. 1- petitioner, Dr. Rafe Akhlaque Ansari, says that his client has been appointed in Maharashtra and, therefore, is not willing to being offered appointment in pursuance to selection in question which is the subject matter of this appeal. 3. We, accordingly, dispose of this appeal as having become infructuous as the judgement of the writ Court qua the respondent no. 1 herein has been rendered otiose. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) October 10, 2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

SPECIAL APPEAL No. 143 of 2024 at Lucknow · Niyam