Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-10-16

SITARAM BARWAL AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-16003/2025 2025:DHC:9248-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SITARAM BARWAL AND ORS
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 16003/2025 SITARAM BARWAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Kaushal, SPC with Ms. Rupali Sinha, GP, Mr. Ajay Pal, Law Officer, Insp. Athurv, CRPF and Mr. Ramniwas Yadav CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 16.10.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The issue in controversy is to the entitlement of the petitioners to the grade pay of ₹ 5400 after having served for four years in the grade pay of ₹ 4800. 2. The issue is covered by the various judgments of this Court including, (i) judgment dated 9 September 2024 in WP(C) 690/2022 (Sushil Kumar v Union of India1), which was affirmed by the Supreme Court on merits by order dated 17 April 2025 in SLP(C) 1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 6482 3. Mr. Kartik Kaushal, learned SPC, candidly acknowledges this position but submits that the department is in the process of filing a review petition, even after the SLP against the decision in Sushil Kumar has been dismissed. 4. Nonetheless, given the above position, the petitioners are clearly entitled to the reliefs