SH. RISHANT SADH & ORS. vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 10.10.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 7207/2025 & CRL.M.A. 30270/2025EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES ETC., CRL.M.A. 30271/2025 STAY, CRL.M.A. 30272/2025 DELAY 25 DAYS IN RE-FILING OF PETITION. SH. RISHANT SADH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Ms. Neeta Goyal, Mr. B.K. Singh, Advs. with all petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP with SI Sunit, PS Jagatpuri. Ms. Shalu Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 129/2017, dated 13.05.2017, registered at P.S Jagatpuri, Delhi under Sections CRL.M.C. 7207/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:10.10.2025 18:53:38 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 21.02.2010 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at New Delhi. No child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since 15.09.2013. 3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 498A/406/354A/354B/34 IPC. 4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes before the Delhi Mediation Centre Karkardo