SH DINESH SINGHAL ALIAS SINDHAL vs DEEPAK JAIN & ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.10.2025 CM(M) 1975/2025, CM APPL. 64046/2025 & CM APPL. 64045/2025 SH DINESH SINGHAL ALIAS SINDHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Chander Agrawal, Advocate. versus DEEPAK JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (defendant no.1 in the suit) has assailed order dated 30.08.2025, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant no.1, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 3. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows. The present respondent no.1/plaintiff filed a suit against the present petitioner (as defendant no.1) as well as the East Delhi Municipal Corporation (now, MCD) and the local police station, seeking permanent CM(M) 1975/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc 4. Learned counsel for petitioner/defendant no.1 contends that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law because the subject premises having already been booked by the MCD, it is