SH DINESH SINGHAL ALIAS SINDHAL vs DEEPAK JAIN & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.10.2025 + CM(M) 1975/2025, CM APPL. 64046/2025 & CM APPL. 64045/2025 SH DINESH SINGHAL ALIAS SINDHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Chander Agrawal, Advocate. versus DEEPAK JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (defendant no.1 in the suit) has assailed order dated 30.08.2025, whereby his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant no.1, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 3. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are as follows. The present respondent no.1/plaintiff filed a suit against the present petitioner (as defendant no.1) as well as the East Delhi Municipal Corporation (now, MCD) and the local police station, seeking permanent CM(M) 1975/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4af ec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc Signature Not Verified KATHPALIA a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.10.13 17:04:31 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:13.10.2025 17:38:20 and mandatory injunction to restrain the present petitioner/defendant no.1 from carrying out further structural construction activity in his premises (the subject premises), which are adjacent to the premises of the present respondent no.1/plaintiff; the present respondent no.1/plaintiff also sought mandatory injunction to the municipal and police authorities to remove the illegal and u